Week 6 – Phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems

Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 6 Workshop 2a

R.A. Viscarra Rossel & L. Walden

2026-03-24

Recap from Tuesday


1 – Carbon:

  • C pools and fluxes; \(\Delta C = I - kC\)
  • SOC pools (DOC, POC, MAOC, PyC) with different turnover times
  • Banksia sands vs Jarrah laterites: different stabilisation capacity

2 – Nitrogen:

  • N cycle: fixation, mineralisation, nitrification, losses
  • High litter C:N → strong N immobilisation and tight cycling
  • Microbial C:N vs litter C:N controls N availability

Learning goals


By the end of this workshop, you will be able to:

  • Explain why P has no atmospheric pool and why P limitation is persistent

  • Describe how P sorption to Fe/Al oxides locks P away in old WA soils

  • Compare Banksia cluster roots vs Jarrah mycorrhizae as P-access strategies

  • Apply C:P stoichiometry to predict immobilisation vs mineralisation

  • Discuss how cultural burning affects P cycling differently from N

Why phosphorus matters in ecosystems

  • Phosphorus (P): essential for

    • ATP, DNA/RNA, cell membranes
    • Key for energy transfer, growth, reproduction
  • No atmospheric P pool — entirely from rock weathering

  • Ancient, weathered Australian soils often chronically P-limited

The phosphorus cycle — pools

  • Rock P (primary minerals, e.g. apatite)
  • Soil P (sorbed to minerals, unavailable)
  • Available P in soil solution (tiny pool)
  • Organic P (in biomass and SOM)
  • Plant P (in tissues)
  • Sedimentary P (in lakes, oceans)
  • Atmospheric P (dust, volcanic ash - negligible)

The phosphorus cycle — processes

  • Weathering → soil P (very slow)
  • Mineralisation ↔︎ immobilisation (biological, like N and C, but P as limiting)
  • Sorption ↔︎ desorption (chemical)
  • Plant uptake and tight recycling
  • Sedimentation and geological burial
  • Erosion and runoff losses
  • Fertiliser inputs (in managed systems)
  • Atmospheric deposition (dust, volcanic ash - minor)

Key contrast with C and N

No gaseous losses from P.
Recovery: P in centuries (weathering), C in years–decades (NPP), N in decades (fixation),

How P sorption works in WA soils

  • Fe/Al oxide surfaces carry positive charges at typical WA soil pH

  • Dissolved PO₄³⁻ binds tightly to these surfaces

  • Initially adsorbed (reversible) → progressively occluded (irreversible)

  • Result: total P can be moderate but available P is tiny (< 5 mg/kg)

Syers and Cornforth (1983)

Comparing C, N and P in ecosystems

Aspect Carbon Nitrogen Phosphorus
Source Atmosphere (CO₂) via NPP Atmosphere (N₂) via fixation Rock weathering only
Mobility Respired as CO₂, leached as DOC High (NO₃⁻ leaches) Low (sorbs to minerals)
Main losses Respiration, fire, erosion Leaching, denitrification, fire Erosion, runoff
Recovery Years–decades (via NPP) Decades (via fixation) Centuries (weathering)

P limitation is harder to reverse than N limitation

No atmospheric pool, no biological fixation — once lost, recovery depends on weathering.

Banksia on SCP sands — cluster roots

  • Deep Bassendean sands: very low total and available P

  • Cluster (proteoid) roots:

    • Dense mats of fine rootlets
    • Release organic acids that dissolve P from mineral surfaces
    • Release phosphatases that cleave P from organic molecules
  • High P resorption from leaves (>80%)

Lambers et al. (2014)

Jarrah on laterites — mycorrhizal P access

  • Laterites: moderate total P, but strongly sorbed

  • Jarrah forms ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations

  • Mycorrhizal strategy (ECM + AM):

    • Hyphae extend beyond the root depletion zone
    • Access P in fine pores roots cannot enter
    • Some ECM fungi also produce organic acids
  • Deep roots access P from less-weathered horizons

Two strategies for the same challenge

Banksia — cluster roots

  • Intense, localised mobilisation
  • Chemical attack on mineral surfaces
  • Short-lived bursts (days–weeks)
  • High leaf resorption → high litter C:P

Jarrah — mycorrhizal networks

  • Extensive soil volume exploration
  • Hyphal access to fine pores
  • Persistent networks (months–years)
  • Mod. leaf resorption → mod. litter C:P

Both systems: tight P conservation, high litter C:P, strong P immobilisation

Pasture systems — P inputs and shifts

  • Cleared native land → pasture:
    • Fertiliser P (superphosphate)
    • Shallow-rooted, short-lived plants
    • Higher available P in topsoil
  • Consequences:
    • P leaches on sands, runs off on slopes
    • Elevated P disrupts native species adapted to low P

Litter and soil C:P

Soil C:P is an ecological indicator of P availability and microbial activity.

Mineral topsoils C:P 10s to a 100s → varies strongly by ecosystem and depth.

  • Higher C:P → relatively lower P availability (stronger P limitation)
  • Lower C:P → relatively higher P availability (P less limiting; other limits possible)

Typical patterns in the SCP sand–laterite–pasture gradient (approximate):

  • Banksia:
    litter C:P ~1000–1500, soil C:P ~200–400
  • Jarrah:
    litter C:P ~800–1200, soil C:P ~150–300
  • Pasture:
    litter C:P ~300–600, soil C:P ~100–200

Microbial C:P and immobilisation–mineralisation

Microbial biomass: around C:P ≈ 60:1

When litter C:P is much higher:

  • Microbes are strongly P‑limited
  • They take up inorganic P from soil
  • Net immobilisation

When litter C:P is closer to 60:1:

  • Litter supplies more of the P microbes need
  • Less extra P is taken from soil
  • Higher chance of net mineralisation

P limitation is usually stronger

In native WA litter, C:P is much higher than 60:1, so microbes tend to immobilise P strongly.

Worked example — litter C:P and P availability

Microbial requirement: C:P ≈ 60:1

Banksia, C:P = 1200

  • Microbes need 20 P per 1200 C
  • Litter supplies 1
  • 19 short
    strong immobilisation

Jarrah, C:P = 900

  • Microbes need 15 P per
    900 C
  • Litter supplies 1
  • 14 short
    immobilisation

Pasture, C:P = 400

  • Microbes need 7 P per
    400 C
  • Litter supplies 1
  • 6 short
    immobilisation

All three systems immobilise P, but strength differs: Banksia > Jarrah > pasture. Fertiliser- derived P pool in pastures makes microbes less P‑limited → immobilisation is weaker.

Activity (handout 15 min) — C:P and P limitation

For each system (Banksia, Jarrah, pasture):

Part (i) (5 min)

– Fill in the Notes column

  • What drives the litter and soil C:P patterns?

  • P conservation strategies, fertiliser inputs

Part (ii) (10 min)

– Predict immobilisation vs mineralisation

  • Compare litter C:P to microbial C:P ≈ 60:1

  • Classify: microbial P limitation (low/med/high)

  • Classify: P loss risk if fertiliser added (low/med/high)

  • Answer the two short questions

Discussion (5 min) — patterns and implications


- Which system most strongly immobilises inorganic P?

  • Which system has higher available P and loss risk?

  • How do C:P patterns help explain:

    • Why Banksia needs cluster roots and Jarrah needs mycorrhizae?
    • P enrichment and species shifts in fertilised pasture?

Indigenous fire and phosphorus

  • P is not volatilised by fire (unlike N and C)

  • Ash redistributes P locally → temporary increasing available P

  • Cultural burning:

    • Low-intensity, patchy burns
    • P redistributed via ash without erosion
    • Creates local P “hot spots” for regeneration

Activity (5 min + homework) — P strategies and management

Part (iii) on your handout (can complete for homework):

  1. For each system, describe the main plant P‑acquisition strategy and how it relates to soil C:P
    • Banksia: cluster roots + high resorption
    • Jarrah: mycorrhizae + moderate resorption
    • Pasture: fertiliser reliance
  2. Which land‑use is most at risk of long‑term P depletion at landscape scale?
    • Consider: erosion, runoff, leaching (on sands), no biological replenishment
  3. Where is high C:P advantageous vs where does it limit productivity?

Linking P back to carbon and nitrogen

P availability controls carbon storage

Low P → limits NPP and litter inputs (\(I\) in \(\Delta C = I - kC\))

High litter C:P → strong P immobilisation → limits nutrient cycling

P limits C storage even when N is adequate → co-limitation

P cannot be replenished biologically → unlike N (fixation) or C (NPP), recovery requires geological weathering (centuries+)

You’ve seen how C, N, and P each limit C storage in different ways; Next workshop we put them together in full CNP stoichiometry.

Key takeaways

  • P has no atmospheric pool; in old WA soils, P is strongly sorbed to Fe/Al oxides, so P limitation is persistent and hard to reverse.

  • Banksia cluster roots (organic acids + phosphatases) and Jarrah mycorrhizae are specialised strategies that tightly conserve and access P under chronic limitation.

  • Litter C:P >> microbial C:P (much larger mismatch than for C:N), so microbes usually immobilise P strongly during decomposition, especially in native systems.

  • Fire does not volatilise P; cultural burning redistributes P via ash and creates short‑lived fertility “hot spots” while largely conserving P at landscape scale.

Next: We integrate C, N, and P as a coupled system.

Leave a comment or question