Root Zone Hydrology and the Rhizosphere

Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 5 Workshop 1a

Raphael Viscarra Rossel & Lewis Walden

2026-03-16

Recap: Week 4

The soil-plant-atmosphere continuum:

  • Plants, soil, and atmosphere are dynamically linked through water and carbon fluxes
  • Last week: processes at the ecosystem and canopy scale

Today — zooming in:

  • Session A: Root zone hydrology and water uptake
  • Session B: Rhizosphere biogeochemistry and nutrient uptake

Learning goals

By the end of Session A you should be able to:

  • Define the effective root zone and root system architecture
  • Explain how root traits and soil physics control water uptake
  • Describe depletion zones and rhizosphere water processes
  • Compare SCP sands and Scarp laterites in terms of root-zone hydrology
  • Explain how root-zone depth affects recharge and salinity risk

From the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum to the root zone

  • Water moves along a \(\Psi\) gradient: soil → root → leaf → atmosphere
  • Soil PAW and \(\Psi\) set the potential water supply

Today:

  • Which parts of the soil actually supply that water?
  • How do roots and soils co-control uptake?
  • What happens when we change the vegetation?

What is the effective root zone?

  • Soil volume that actively supplies water to plants
  • Defined by function (active uptake), not just structure (where roots are present)
  • Determined by root presence and hydraulic properties

Tip

Not the same as “max rooting depth”, most uptake often from top 0.5–1 m, even if roots extend deeper

Root system architecture

Components

  • Taproot vs lateral roots
  • Coarse roots (support, transport); fine roots (uptake)
  • Root hairs increase surface area; rhizosheaths (soil bound to roots)

Why it matters

  • Controls where water and nutrients are accessed
  • Sets the geometry of the effective root zone

Root length density with depth: patterns and implications

  • Most species: highest root length density near surface (~30 cm), declining exponentially with depth
  • Some trees: significant fine roots in deeper horizons

Implications for water supply

  • Shallow-dominated systems: rely on PAW in top 0.5 m (e.g., annual crops, shallow-rooted shrubs)
  • Deep-distributed: accesses more buffered deeper storage

Soil controls on roots

What limits root penetration?

  • Physical barriers: compaction, hardpans, waterlogging
  • Chemical barriers: aluminium toxicity, salinity
  • Set the maximum depth of the effective root zone

Note

  • Plant strategy determines where roots try to grow; soil constraints determine where they can grow

Linking root zone to plant available water (PAW)

Recall

  • PAW = water held between FC and PWP
  • Texture controls how much PAW there is

Now add roots

  • Root distribution determines which depths contribute to uptake

  • Effective root zone = overlap of PAW availability and root presence

Radial water flow to roots mechanisms

  • Root uptake lowers \(\Psi\) at root surface
  • Radial gradient: bulk soil → rhizosphere → root

Consequence

  • Water moves thru unsaturated flow to roots
  • As soil dries, conductivity drops faster than gradient increases → uptake slows

  • This creates a zone of depleted soil water around active roots.

Depletion zones (DZ)

  • Zone of drier soil around active roots (mm to cm scale)
  • Scale: mm–cm around fine roots

Controlled by

  • Transpiration demand (uptake rate)
  • Soil hydraulic conductivity
  • Root density: soil dries faster when DZ overlap

Under drought, the rhizosphere dominates resistance to water flow—even if bulk soil still holds water.

The Rhizosphere

  • Soil directly influenced by living roots (mm–cm)
  • Modified by exudates (carbon-rich compounds), mucilage (gel-like secretions), root growth

Water-related effects

  • Altered pore geometry and aggregation
  • Mucilage maintains hydraulic contact between root and soil at moderate dryness


Critical matric potential \(\Psi_m\)

  • \(\Psi_m\) threshold below which plants cannot extract water fast enough to meet transpiration demand
  • Near this, uptake declines sharply

Near critical \(\Psi_m\)

  • Most of the potential drop occurs within 1–2 mm of root. The rhizosphere becomes the bottleneck for water supply

- Hydraulic properties dominate resistance

Root and rhizosphere traits

Traits affecting water uptake

  • Fine root density — maximises surface area in water-rich horizons
  • Rhizosheaths and mucilage — maintain hydraulic contact as soil dries
  • Deep rooting — accesses buffered stores below seasonal drying front
  • Plastic root growth — roots grow toward available moisture

SCP Bassendean sands – setting

Soil–climate context

  • Deep, leached quartz sands (very low clay)
  • Low PAW (~30–50 mm/m); rapid drainage
  • Mediterranean climate: wet winter, 4–5 month summer drought

Hydrological implication

  • Effective root zone shallow, transiently wet

Banksia root-zone strategy: shallow exploiter


  • Dense fine roots in upper 0.5 m capture transient winter–spring moisture
  • Some Banksia sp. send roots to shallow groundwater (phreatophytic), but most rely on shallow storage
  • Strong rhizosphere specialisation (cluster roots, rhizosheaths)

Darling Scarp laterites – setting

Soil–climate context

  • Sandy A over ferruginous B, pallid zone (retains moisture) at depth
  • Higher integrated PAW over 2 m depth (100–150 mm)
  • Similar climate, different storage profile

Hydrological implication

  • Effective root zone includes deep buffered storage in pallid zone

Jarrah root-zone strategy

Strategy: deep miner

  • Shallow laterals capture nutrients and winter rain in the A horizon
  • Deep taproots penetrate laterite (via fractures) into the moist pallid zone (1–3 m depth)
  • Pallid zone retains moisture through summer, which supports evergreen canopy and high ET
  • Dimorphic root system: shallow roots for nutrients, deep roots for water

SCP vs Scarp – root-zone contrasts

SCP (Bassendean sands) Scarp (laterites)
Low PAW per metre Higher integrated PAW over 2 m depth
Shallow effective root zone (0.5 m) Deep effective root zone (0–2 m +)
Shallow exploiter strategy (Banksia) Deep miner strategy (Jarrah)
Limited drought buffering Access to buffered moisture in pallid zone
High salinity risk on valley floors Lower salinity risk, but nutrient leaching concerns
Rapid drainage, low runoff More water retained in landscape, higher ET
Seasonal water stress for plants More stable water supply through summer

Root zone, recharge, and salinity

Clearing Jarrah → pasture (Scarp)

  • Shallow roots replace deep taproots
  • ET drops, pallid zone no longer accessed
  • ↑ deep drainage, ↑ watertable, salinity risk

Clearing Banksia → pasture (SCP)

  • Smaller change in root-zone depth
  • Increased leaching of nutrients on deep sands
  • Salinity risk lower ’cause deep watertable (>5 m)

Important

The same land-use change produces very different hydrological outcomes depending on the landscape

Activity in pairs (10 min): Scenarios

Two Scarp catchments (same rainfall, geology):

  • A: Intact Jarrah forest
  • B: Cleared 40 years ago, pasture

Tip

Use concepts: effective root zone, PAW, Jarrah vs Banksia strategies

Compare the two catchments: (7 min)

  1. Effective root-zone depth in summer?
  2. Soil moisture at 1–2 m depth in summer?
  3. Which has higher recharge? Why?
  4. Salinity and baseflow implications?

Share one key difference + one management implication (3 min)

Key takeaways

  • Effective root zone = functional concept (active water supply), not maximum rooting depth; controlled by root architecture and soil hydraulics

  • Near critical \(\Psi_m\), rhizosphere water properties dominate resistance to uptake

  • SCP and Scarp fundamentally different strategies—shallow exploiter (Banksia) vs deep miner (Jarrah)

  • Changing vegetation changes effective root zone → altered recharge → salinity and leaching risk (revisit in Week 7)

Next: Root‑zone hydrology across the SCP–Scarp landscape

Leave a comment or question