Carbon in the Soil–Plant–Atmosphere System

Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 4 Workshop 1b

Raphael Viscarra Rossel & Lewis Walden

2026-03-09

Linking water and carbon in the SPAC

Workshop a: Water movement through the continuum

  • Soil → plant → atmosphere
  • Driven by \(\Psi\) gradient

Now: Carbon movement through the same system


The critical link: Stomata

  • Controls both CO\(_2\) influx and H\(_2\)O efflux
  • Water and carbon fluxes are physiologically inseparable

Photosynthesis: Carbon’s entry point

All terrestrial C originates from atmospheric CO\(_2\)

The reaction:

6 CO\(_2\) + 6 H\(_2\)O + light → C\(_6\)H\(_{12}\)O\(_6\) + 6 O\(_2\)

Requires:

  • Light energy
  • Open stomata (for CO\(_2\))
  • Water supply (for transpiration)

This is where carbon enters ecosystems

Gross vs net primary productivity

Gross primary productivity (GPP):

Total C fixed by photosynthesis.

Plant respiration (R\(_a\)):

Plants burn 30–50% of GPP for energy (growth, maintenance).

Net primary productivity (NPP) = GPP − R\(_a\)

  • Carbon available for biomass growth and soil inputs.
  • Units: g C m\(^{-2}\) yr\(^{-1}\)

Carbon allocation in plants: NPP partitioned among plant organs

Aboveground:

  • Leaves, stems and branches
  • Reproductive structures

Belowground:

  • Coarse and fine roots
  • Root exudates
  • Mycorrhizal fungi

Allocation reflects resource limitation

Aboveground carbon allocation

Leaves: Turnover: 1–3 years (evergreens or deciduous)

  • Eventually fall as litter

Stems/wood: Long-lived: decades to centuries

  • Eventually fall as coarse woody debris

Reproductive structures: Flowers, fruits, seeds

  • Relatively small C pool

All eventually become surface litter

Belowground carbon allocation

Fine roots: Rapid turnover: 1–2 years

  • Often 30–50% of NPP
  • Decompose in place (in soil)

Root exudates: Continuous “leakage” from living roots

  • Sugars, amino acids, organic acids
  • 10–40% of photosynthate
  • Drives rhizosphere microbes (Week 5)

Mycorrhizal fungi:

Plants allocate 10–20% NPP to symbionts

Carbon allocation: WA examples

Both WA systems invest heavily belowground (c.f. fertile temperate forests)

  • Nutrient-poor soils drive high root and mycorrhizal investment
  • Sclerophyllous litter slows aboveground decomposition in both systems

Tip

Higher belowground C allocation in nutrient-poor systems

Decomposition: The carbon output

Decomposition ➡ microbial and faunal breakdown of OM

\[R_{eco} = R_a + R_h\]

  • R\(_a\) = autotrophic respiration (plants and roots)
  • R\(_h\) = heterotrophic respiration (decomposers) — the primary C output from soil

What controls decomposition rate?

  • Substrate quality
  • Temperature
  • Moisture
  • Oxygen availability

Substrate quality: Litter chemistry

Labile carbon (fast decomposition):

  • Sugars, starches, simple proteins
  • Decompose in days to weeks

Recalcitrant carbon (slow decomposition):

  • Lignin, cellulose, waxes
  • Decompose in months to years (decades)

C:N ratio:

  • C:N >30: Slow (microbes N-limited)
  • C:N <20: Fast (microbes have enough N)

Temperature control on decomposition

Temperature sensitivity:

  • Decomposition rate approx. doubles every 10\(^o\)C
  • Q\(_{10}\) ≈ 2

Implications:

  • Tropical soils (hot): very fast decomposition
  • Boreal soils (cold): very slow decomposition
  • Mediterranean (e.g. WA): seasonally variable

Ma et al. (2025)

Climate change concern: Warming → faster decomposition → soil C loss

Moisture and oxygen control on decomposition

Moisture:

  • Optimal: Near field capacity
  • Too dry: Microbial activity limited
  • Too wet: Anaerobic conditions (slow decomposition)

Oxygen:

  • Aerobic respiration: Fast, efficient
  • Anaerobic respiration: Slow, incomplete

WA context:

  • Summer drought inhibits decomposition (despite high temperature)
  • Decomposition pulses during cool, wet winter

Soil carbon balance equation: Change in soil carbon over time

Important

\[\frac{\Delta C_{\text{soil}}}{\Delta t} = \text{Inputs} - \text{Outputs}\]

Three possible outcomes:

  1. Inputs > Outputs → Accumulation
  2. Inputs < Outputs → Loss
  3. Inputs ≈ Outputs → Steady state

Inputs: Litterfall + Root turnover + Exudates

Outputs: Decomposition (R\(_h\)) + Fire + Erosion + Leaching

Water–carbon coupling: the stomatal trade‑off

Water availability controls carbon uptake via stomata.

Water use efficiency (WUE)

\[ = \frac{\text{photosynthesis}}{\text{transpiration}} = \frac{\text{C gained }}{\text{unit water lost}} \]

  • Open stomata → more photosynthesis, more water loss
  • Closed stomata → less water loss, little photosynthesis
  • Drought: WUE can rise, but total C gain usually falls

WA context

  • Mediterranean climate → summer stomatal closure
  • Banksia and Jarrah: high WUE under summer drought
  • Hot, dry summers: very low carbon uptake
  • Carbon gain concentrated in cooler, wetter months

Residence time (\(\tau\)): How long does carbon stay in soil?

\[\tau = \frac{C_{\text{stock}}}{\text{Annual output}}\]

Example calculation:

  • Soil C stock: 10 kg C m\(^{-2}\) (top 1 m)
  • Annual output (R\(_h\)): 400 g C m\(^{-2}\) year\(^{-1}\)
  • Mean residence time: \(\tau\) = 10,000 / 400 = 25 years

Reality is more complex:

  • Labile pool: \(\tau\) ~ months to years
  • Stable pool: \(\tau\) ~ decades-centuries

Contrasting ecosystems 1: Tropical rainforest

High productivity, low soil C

  • NPP: 1500 g C m\(^{-2}\) year\(^{-1}\) (very high)
  • Decomposition: Very fast (warm + wet)
  • Litter residence time: ~1 year
  • Soil C stock: 5–10 kg C m\(^{-2}\) (moderate)

Most carbon in living biomass (trees), not soil

Contrasting ecosystems 2: Boreal peatland

Low productivity, very high soil C

  • NPP: 300 g C m\(^{-2}\) year\(^{-1}\) (low)
  • Decomposition: Very slow (cold + waterlogged)
  • Litter residence time: decades to centuries
  • Soil C stock: 30–60 kg C m\(^{-2}\) (extremely high)

Carbon accumulates because outputs << inputs

Contrasting ecosystems 3: WA Banksia woodland

Low inputs, slow outputs, moderate stocks

  • NPP: 400 g C m\(^{-2}\) year\(^{-1}\) (low)
  • Decomposition: Slow (dry summer + recalcitrant litter)
  • Soil C stock: 3–5 kg C m\(^{-2}\) (moderate)
  • Steady state: slow inputs balanced by slow outputs

Fire periodically resets the balance, but also creates stable charcoal

Contrasting ecosystems 4: WA Jarrah forest

Moderate inputs, moderate outputs

  • NPP: 800 g C m\(^{-2}\) year\(^{-1}\) (moderate)
  • Decomposition: Moderate (Mediterranean climate)
  • Soil C stock: 5–8 kg C m\(^{-2}\) (higher than SCP)
  • Deeper A horizon (lateritic profile)

Fire + charcoal contribute to stable C pool

Disturbance: Clearing and carbon loss

Jarrah forest → agricultural land

Three mechanisms drive C loss:

  1. NPP inputs stop
  2. Decomposition increases (tillage, warmer soil)
  3. Aggregate breakdown exposes protected C

Some systems never fully recover


WA-specific feedback: Dryland salinity

Clearing creates a hydrological cascade that locks systems into persistent C loss

  1. Forest removal — transpiration stops
  2. Recharge increases — water table rises
  3. Saline groundwater reaches surface
  4. Salinity inhibits revegetation
  5. C inputs cannot recover — persistent C loss


Warning

Positive feedback — very difficult to reverse

Feedbacks: Fertile systems

Positive reinforcement:

  1. High soil C ➡ good structure, water retention, nutrients
  2. Supports productive vegetation ➡ high NPP
  3. High C inputs ➡ maintains/increases soil C
  4. Cycle reinforces itself

Example: Temperate deciduous forests on loess soils

Fertile systems resist degradation

Feedbacks: Degraded systems

Negative reinforcement:

  1. Low soil C ➡ poor structure, low water retention, low nutrients
  2. Supports only low-productivity vegetation ➡ low NPP
  3. Low C inputs ➡ soil C cannot rebuild

Example: Cleared SCP sands

Warning

Degraded systems locked into low-C state

Fire and carbon in Australian ecosystems

Fire is a natural component shaped by 50,000+ years of Indigenous fire management

Fire management:

  • Shapes fire-adapted vegetation
  • Maintains ecosystem structure
  • Manages fuel loads

Carbon impacts:

  • Combustion: C → CO₂
  • Charcoal: Stable C formation
  • Regrowth: Vegetation recovery

Fire frequency and intensity: Managing carbon balance

Low frequency (>10 years)

  • Fuel accumulates
  • High-intensity fires
  • Large C loss per event
  • Long recovery

High frequency (<5 years)

  • Limited fuel
  • Low-intensity fires
  • Small C loss per event
  • Frequent cumulative loss

Cultural burning (Indigenous practice)

  • Frequent, low-intensity
  • Mosaic patterns
  • Moderate total C loss
  • Prevents catastrophic fires
  • Maintains biodiversity

Fire frequency and intensity effects

Note

Cultural burning maintains C stocks. 50,000+ years of adaptive management.

Cultural burning: Video (5 min) + discussion (5 min)

Discussion (5 min):

  1. How do different fire frequencies and intensities affect carbon balance?

  2. Why might cultural burning lead to less carbon (C) loss than large wildfires?

  3. How does fire change vegetation and soil in ways that affect soil C?

  4. What lessons about managing Country come from Indigenous fire practice?

Key takeaways

1. Carbon enters via photosynthesis (NPP)

  • Flows into vegetation and soil
  • Belowground inputs often dominate in nutrient-poor systems

2. Soil C balance = Inputs − Outputs

  • Outputs: mainly decomposition (R\(_h\)), plus fire and erosion
  • Net balance: gain, loss, or steady state of soil C

Key takeaways

3. Ecosystems differ in C stocks

  • High productivity ≠ high soil C
  • Slow decomposition → large C stores (e.g. peatlands)
  • WA: moderate stocks, slow change

4. Disturbance and fire disrupt C balance

  • Clearing and severe fire → rapid C loss
  • Cultural burning can support long-term vegetation and soil C

Looking ahead

Next Workshop: Quantitative water and carbon budgets

  • Water balance calculations, ET partitioning
  • C budget calculations, NPP allocation, residence times

Week 5: Plant–soil–water interactions (rhizosphere focus)

Week 6: Biogeochemical cycles (C, N, P in detail)

Leave a comment or question