The Soil-Water-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum

Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 4 Workshop 1a

Raphael Viscarra Rossel & Lewis Walden

2026-03-09


Weeks 1–3 (ULO1): Static patterns

  • Where soils occur across landscapes
  • Why they vary (formation processes, CLORPT)
  • Properties determined by formation history


Weeks 4–6 (ULO2): Dynamic processes

  • Soils and landscapes as living, functioning systems
  • How soil, water, and vegetation interact
  • Fluxes, cycles, and feedbacks


Today: Understanding the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum

What is the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum ?


Continuous pathway for water movement driven by energy gradients

An integrated hydraulic network:

  • links soil, plants and atmosphere into a functioning system.

The mechanism that couples plant transpiration to soil water availability:

  • water and carbon fluxes are jointly controlled along the continuum.

Brady & Weil (2008)

The soil–(water)–plant–atmosphere continuum pathway

Water moves continuously through connected components:

  1. Soil ➡ water stored in pores
  2. Roots ➡ uptake from soil into root xylem
  3. Xylem ➡ transport through stem to leaves
  4. Leaves ➡ evaporation from mesophyll cells
  5. Atmosphere ➡ water vapor diffuses away
  • Force → water potential gradient (\(\Psi\))

Water potential: The driving force

  • Water potential (\(\Psi\)) = free energy of water

  • Units: MPa (megapascals) or bars

  • Direction of flow: High \(\Psi\) ➡ Low \(\Psi\)

Tip

Water moves from less negative (↑ energy) to more negative (↓ energy)

Water potential gradient: typical values

Component Water potential \(\Psi\)
Wet soil −0.01 to −0.03 MPa
Dry soil −0.5 to −1.5 MPa
Root xylem −0.5 to −2 MPa
Leaf xylem −1 to −3 MPa
Atmosphere −50 to −100 MPa

Note

The atmosphere is extremely “thirsty”. It pulls water through the entire system

Components of soil water potential

Total soil water potential \(\Psi_{\rm soil}\) is described by:

Important

\(\Psi_{\rm soil} = \Psi_{\rm matric} + \Psi_{\rm gravitational} + \Psi_{\rm osmotic}\)


  • These three components control water availability
  • Matric potential (\(\Psi_m\)) is usually dominant in unsaturated soils

1. Matric potential (\(\Psi_m\)): Controls plant water availability

Attraction of water to soil particles

  • Capillary forces (menisci in pores)
  • Adsorptive forces (water films on particle surfaces)

Key properties:

  • Always negative (water held by attraction)
  • Becomes more negative as soil dries
  • Dominant component in unsaturated soils

2. Gravitational potential (\(\Psi_g\)): Usually small compared to \(\Psi_m\)

Effect of elevation on water potential

  • Increases +0.01 MPa per meter of elevation
  • Drives vertical water movement

Examples:

  • Drainage: water moves downward (gravity)
  • Capillary rise: water moves up if \(\Psi\) forces > gravity

3. Osmotic potential (\(\Psi_o\)): Effect of dissolved salts in soil water

  • Solutes reduce water \(\Psi\) (make it more negative)
  • Plant must overcome osmotic barrier to extract water

When important:

  • Saline soils (coastal areas, evaporite deposits)
  • Dryland salinity (WA wheat belt, cleared Scarp)

Not typically limiting in native WA systems. Critical where clearing raised water table

Video: Soil water potential components

Plant and soil water potential:


In plants:

\(\Psi = \Psi_{\text{pressure}} + \Psi_{\text{solute}}\)


In soils:

\(\Psi_{\text{soil}} = \Psi_{\text{matric}} + \Psi_{\text{gravitational}} + \Psi_{\text{osmotic}}\)

Plant-available water: The storage reservoir

  • Not all soil water is accessible to plants

Plant-available water (PAW) = water held between two thresholds

  • Controls how long plants can transpire after rain stops – directly determines drought resilience and growing-season length.

  • Set by texture, structure, and organic matter – sands have low PAW; clays hold more but tighter; improving structure/OM increases PAW.

Field capacity (FC): Soil water content after gravity drainage

  • Typically 24–48 hours after saturation (e.g., heavy rain)
  • Water potential: \(\Psi_m\)−0.01 to −0.03 MPa (−10 to −33 kPa)

Characteristics:

  • Macropores drained (good aeration)
  • Meso and micropores still filled (water available)

Important

Upper limit of plant-available water

Soil “full” but not waterlogged

Permanent wilting point (PWP): Where plants cannot extract water

  • Water potential: \(\Psi_m\)−1.5 MPa (−1500 kPa)
  • Roots cannot generate sufficient \(\Psi\) gradient

Characteristics:

  • Soil contains some water (not dry)
  • Water held too tightly by soil matrix

Important

Lower limit of plant-available water

Plants wilt irreversibly

Plant-available water and texture

Important

PAW = FC − PWP

The difference in volumetric water content (mm per m depth) between FC and PWP

Texture PAW (% vol) PAW (mm/m depth)
Sand 5–10% 40–80 mm
Loam 15–20% 150–200 mm
Clay 15–25% 150–250 mm

Root water uptake: Creating gradients

Mechanism:

  1. Root absorbs water ➡ lowers \(\Psi\) in rhizosphere
  2. Creates radial gradient: bulk soil ➡ root surface
  3. Water moves along gradient (unsaturated flow)

Depletion zone:

  • Forms cylinder of drier soil around active roots
  • Typically extends 1–5 mm from fine roots
  • Depends on uptake rate, conductivity, root density

WA example: Swan Coastal Plain Banksia

Bassendean sands:

  • Soil: Quartz sands (<3% clay)
  • PAW: 40–60 mm in top 1 m
  • Rainfall: 700–900 mm, 5–6 month summer drought
  • Water table: 5–20 m depth (inaccessible to roots)

Banksia adaptations to low water availability

Water dynamics:

  • Winter: rain infiltrates rapidly, drains quickly
  • Brief window of high \(\Psi\) (days to weeks)
  • Summer: soil \(\Psi\) declines to PWP fast

Note

Strategy: minimise demand to match low supply

Plant adaptations:

  • Shallow, dense roots, 80% of biomass in top 50cm
  • Proteoid roots: cluster roots (Week 5)
  • Sclerophylly: thick, waxy leaves reduce transpiration
  • Low stomatal conductance: conservative water use

WA example: Darling Scarp Jarrah forest

Lateritic profile — deeply weathered Archaean basement, greater water storage than SCP


  • Soil: Sandy A horizon over clayey B (laterite)
  • PAW: 150–200 mm in top 2 m
  • Pallid zone: Moist kaolinitic layer at 5–15 m depth
  • Rainfall: 800–1200 mm, Mediterranean climate

Jarrah adaptations to seasonal drought

Water dynamics:

  • Winter: A horizon saturates, B horizon may have perched water
  • Summer: A horizon dries but pallid zone retains moisture

Note

Strategy: deep water access → high productivity through summer

Plant adaptations:

  • Dimorphic root system:
    • Shallow lateral roots (0–50 cm): seasonal rainfall
    • Deep tap roots (5–15 m): pallid zone moisture
  • Higher transpiration: 100–300 L tree⁻¹ day⁻¹ (summer)
  • Evergreen canopy, no summer dormancy

Plant hydraulic traits trade-offs: Conflicting demands

High conductance (wide xylem):

  • ✔️ High water flow and transpiration
  • ❌ High cavitation risk (vulnerable to drought)

Low conductance (narrow xylem):

  • ✔️ Safer: lower cavitation risk
  • ❌ Limited water flow and photosynthesis

Bottom line: plants balance efficiency vs safety; there is no single optimal solution.

Soil moisture control on plant function

Stomata are the regulatory valve linking water loss and carbon gain

Wet (\(\Psi\) > −0.5 MPa)

  • High transpiration and photosynthesis

Moderate (−0.5 to −1.5 MPa)

  • Reduced transpiration and photosynthesis

Severe (\(\Psi\) < −1.5 MPa)

  • Zero growth, survival mode


Activity (10 min): Case study discussion

Scenario: Two sites SCP both 800 mm rain

  • Site A: Banksia woodland (never cleared)
  • Site B: Cleared 50 years ago, now revegetated (10-year-old seedlings)

Soil differences:

  • Site A: 2–3% organic matter, intact structure
  • Site B: <1% organic matter, compacted surface

Questions (7 min, pairs, then share 3 min):

  1. How does lower OM at Site B affect PAW?
  2. How does compaction affect infiltration & roots?
  3. Predict soil \(\Psi\) dynamics through summer (A vs B)
  4. Why might seedlings at B experience more stress?
  5. Management to improve Site B?

Key takeaways

1. SPAC = integrated hydraulic system

  • Water flows soil → plant → atmosphere along a \(\Psi\) gradient.

2. Soil matric potential controls water availability

  • PAW = water between field capacity and wilting point; depends on texture.

3. WA ecosystems differ in water storage and access

  • Banksia (SCP): low PAW, shallow roots, conservative strategy.
  • Jarrah (Scarp): higher PAW + deep water access, high productivity.

Key takeaways (cont.)

4. Plants balance hydraulic efficiency vs safety

  • Wide xylem = high flow but cavitation risk; narrow = safe but slow.

5. Soil moisture couples water and carbon

  • Wet soil → open stomata → high function; dry soil → closed stomata → survival.

Next: Carbon in the soil–plant–atmosphere system

Leave a comment or question