Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 4 Workshop 1a
2026-03-09
Weeks 1–3 (ULO1): Static patterns
Weeks 4–6 (ULO2): Dynamic processes
Today: Understanding the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum
Continuous pathway for water movement driven by energy gradients
An integrated hydraulic network:
The mechanism that couples plant transpiration to soil water availability:
Brady & Weil (2008)
Water moves continuously through connected components:
Water potential (\(\Psi\)) = free energy of water
Units: MPa (megapascals) or bars
Direction of flow: High \(\Psi\) ➡ Low \(\Psi\)
Tip
Water moves from less negative (↑ energy) to more negative (↓ energy)
| Component | Water potential \(\Psi\) |
|---|---|
| Wet soil | −0.01 to −0.03 MPa |
| Dry soil | −0.5 to −1.5 MPa |
| Root xylem | −0.5 to −2 MPa |
| Leaf xylem | −1 to −3 MPa |
| Atmosphere | −50 to −100 MPa |
Note
The atmosphere is extremely “thirsty”. It pulls water through the entire system
Total soil water potential \(\Psi_{\rm soil}\) is described by:
Important
\(\Psi_{\rm soil} = \Psi_{\rm matric} + \Psi_{\rm gravitational} + \Psi_{\rm osmotic}\)
Attraction of water to soil particles
Key properties:
Effect of elevation on water potential
Examples:
When important:
Not typically limiting in native WA systems. Critical where clearing raised water table
Plant and soil water potential:
In plants:
\(\Psi = \Psi_{\text{pressure}} + \Psi_{\text{solute}}\)
In soils:
\(\Psi_{\text{soil}} = \Psi_{\text{matric}} + \Psi_{\text{gravitational}} + \Psi_{\text{osmotic}}\)
Plant-available water (PAW) = water held between two thresholds
Controls how long plants can transpire after rain stops – directly determines drought resilience and growing-season length.
Set by texture, structure, and organic matter – sands have low PAW; clays hold more but tighter; improving structure/OM increases PAW.
Characteristics:
Important
Upper limit of plant-available water
Soil “full” but not waterlogged
Characteristics:
Important
Lower limit of plant-available water
Plants wilt irreversibly
Important
PAW = FC − PWP
The difference in volumetric water content (mm per m depth) between FC and PWP
| Texture | PAW (% vol) | PAW (mm/m depth) |
|---|---|---|
| Sand | 5–10% | 40–80 mm |
| Loam | 15–20% | 150–200 mm |
| Clay | 15–25% | 150–250 mm |
Mechanism:
Depletion zone:
Bassendean sands:
Water dynamics:
Note
Strategy: minimise demand to match low supply
Plant adaptations:
Lateritic profile — deeply weathered Archaean basement, greater water storage than SCP
Water dynamics:
Note
Strategy: deep water access → high productivity through summer
Plant adaptations:
High conductance (wide xylem):
Low conductance (narrow xylem):
Bottom line: plants balance efficiency vs safety; there is no single optimal solution.
Stomata are the regulatory valve linking water loss and carbon gain
Wet (\(\Psi\) > −0.5 MPa)
Moderate (−0.5 to −1.5 MPa)
Severe (\(\Psi\) < −1.5 MPa)
Scenario: Two sites SCP both 800 mm rain
Soil differences:
Questions (7 min, pairs, then share 3 min):
1. SPAC = integrated hydraulic system
2. Soil matric potential controls water availability
3. WA ecosystems differ in water storage and access
4. Plants balance hydraulic efficiency vs safety
5. Soil moisture couples water and carbon
Next: Carbon in the soil–plant–atmosphere system