Measuring Landscapes Soils and Surface Environments
Landscape soils and surface environments - Week 3 Workshop 1a”
Raphael Viscarra Rossel & Lewis Walden
2026-03-03
Where we are
Week 1: Landscapes are spatially organized systems
- Vary at multiple scales across space and time
Week 2: CLORPT explains soil formation
- processess create different soils: mineralogy → properties → ecosystem function
Today: How do we measure and quantify this variability.
Before we start lets recall how soil properties interact: Activity (7 min)
Explore how texture, organic matter, and clay mineralogy affect other impoortant properties like CEC, plant-available water, pH, and bulk density.
Link to activity
Or copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://ravr19.github.io/lsse_teaching/soil_property_explorer_app.html
⓵ Use sliders to see how interacting physical and biochemical properties interact.
⓶ Answer the questions in your own words. If you dont finish you can complete them later.
What we’ll cover today
First half: Measurement methods
- Measuring vegetation properties
- Measuring soil properties
- Sensing technologies (proximal and remote)
- Demonstration: soil spectroscopy
Second half: Sampling. Where to measure?
- Importance of sampling desing
- Sampling desings
- Comparing desings for landscape studies
Measurement matters in variable landscapes
![]()
"To measure is to know. If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it." – Lord Kelvin
Two fundamental questions:
- What methods can we use to measure soil and vegetation properties?
- Direct measurements (field and lab)
- Remote sensing (satellite, aerial)
- Proximal sensing (ground-based sensors)
- Where should we sample to capture variability?
Why this matters: SDG 15 — Life on Land
Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems
We can’t manage what we don’t measure:
- Where is land degraded?
- Is restoration working?
- Where do we prioritise intervention?
Measurement provides the evidence base for action
Spatial variability drives measurement needs
Take soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, it is highly variable over short (<10 m) and longer (>50 m) distances
How many samples to capture this?
1-5 ~ likely misrepresents the landscape
5-20 ~ provides a rough estimate of the mean
20-50+ ~ start capturing spatial structure
100+ ~ suitable for spatial modelling and mapping
This is why sampling design matters → Second half of today
Temporal variability must be considered
A single measurement is a snapshot — not representative
When we measure matters as much as where we measure
Temporal variability matters: Monthly vegetation greenness (NDVI)
- Monthly vegetation change
- Maximum: peak growing season
- Minimum: summer drought period
WHEN we sample matters as much as WHERE
Three complementary measurement approaches
Direct measurements
- Field observations
- Laboratory analysis
- High accuracy
- Limited coverage
- Expensive, slow
Remote sensing
- Satellite, airborne, drone
- Large coverage
- Indirect measurements
- Surface only
- Cost-effective per area
Proximal sensing
- Ground-based sensors
- Close/contact measurement
- High throughput
- Balance speed & accuracy
- Multiple properties at once
Three complementary measurement approaches
- No single approach is “best”
- Depends on objective
- Integration provides richest understanding
Used together - complementary
Comparing measurement approaches
| Lab analysis |
Low |
Points |
10s /day |
💲💲💲 |
| Field observation |
Moderate |
Points |
10s /day |
💲💲 |
| Proximal sensing |
Moderate |
Dense points |
100s /day |
💲 |
| RS (drone/air) |
Moderate |
ha–km² |
100s ha /day |
💲 |
| RS (satellite) |
High |
km²–regional |
1000s km² /pass |
💲, free |
No single approach measures everything - often need to use a combinaton
Field measurements: Landscape context
Landscape description provides spatial framework
- Position: hilltop, slope, valley, floodplain
- Landform: dune, plain, ridge, terrace
- Topography: slope gradient, aspect, drainage class
- Surface: texture, roughness, stoniness, crusting
- Erosion status: stable, sheet, rill, gully erosion
- Vegetation: cover, type, structure
![]()
A digital elevation model (DEM) of our study area.
Field measurement methods: Vegetation, what do we measure?
Measurements must match the ecological question and scale of the landscape.
Field measurement methods: Vegetation, how do we measure?
Measurements must be consistent and repeatable for reliable ecological data.
Laboratory measurements: Vegetation
Common methods include:
- Dry biomass (oven-dried)
- Tissue nutrient analysis (N, P, K)
- Organic carbon content
- Mass spectrometry for compositional analysis
- Stable isotopes
- etc…
Field measurements: Soil profile descriptions
- Horizons (A, B, C) and depths
- Colour (Munsell chart)
- Texture, structure, consistence
- Roots, pores, coatings
Field descriptions provide context that laboratory cannot
Field measurements: Soil properties
- pH, EC (portable meters)
- Bulk density (core method)
- Infiltration rate
- Soil moisture (TDR), etc…
Field measurements provide information at field conditions, labs cannot.
Laboratory measurements: Soil properties
![]()
Samples must be dried, crushed, sieved before they are analysed
Remote sensing
Measuring from a distance (>2m above surface)
Platforms:
- Satellites: 10-30m resolution (Sentinel, Landsat)
- Aircraft: 0.5-5m resolution
- Drones/UAVs: cm resolution
Advantages:
- Large spatial coverage
- Repeatable (monitoring)
- Historical archives
- Cost-effective
- Non-destructive
Limitations:
- Indirect measurements
- Coarse resolution (10-30m)
- Surface only (unless active sensors)
- Clouds, weather sensitivity
- Vegetation obscures soil
- Requires calibration
Remote sensing: The electromagnetic spectrum
| Visible |
Chlorophyll, soil colour |
| Near-IR |
Vegetation structure, biomass |
| Shortwave IR |
Clay minerals, water, OM |
| Thermal IR |
Temperature, water stress |
| Microwave |
Soil moisture, roughness |
NDVI = (NIR − Red) / (NIR + Red) - (greenness)
Healthy veg:: ⬆ NIR reflectance, ⬇ red ➡️ ⬆ NDVI
Remote sensing: What can we measure?
Vegetation:
- Cover, biomass, productivity
- Stress indicators (drought, disease)
- Phenology (seasonal changes)
Soil (bare soil only):
- Colour (OM, iron oxides, moisture)
- Mineralogy (clay types, Fe oxides)
- Salinity, erosion features
Vegetation, rocks, etc. obscure soil | Measures only top few mm | Require calibration.
Proximal sensing: Overview
Measuring in close proximity (<2m from soil)
Sensors:
- Vis-NIR / MIR spectroscopy
- XRF (X-ray fluorescence)
- EMI (electromag. induction)
- GPR (ground-penet. radar)
- \(\gamma\)-ray spectrometry, … etc.
Advantages:
- 100–500 samples/day
- May be non-destructive
- Multiple properties
- Field deployable
Limitations:
- Requires calibration
- Lower accuracy than lab
- Sensor-specific training
- Some affected by moisture
Proximal sensing and the EM spectrum
Advantages over lab:
- 100-500 samples/day
- $1-5 per sample
- Non-destructive
- Real-time results
- Field portable
Advantages over remote:
- Direct contact/proximity
- Not affected by weather
- Higher resolution
- No issue with vegetation cover
Remote and proximal sensing and the EM spectrum
Indigenous landscape reading: “Reading Country” principles
- Holistic integration of multiple indicators
- Multi-scale observation: plant → patch → landscape
- Multi-sensory: visual, tactile, olfactory cues
- Temporal knowledge: seasonal patterns, long-term change
- Relational: how components interact, not just isolated properties
Indigenous landscape reading
Vegetation as indicators:
- Certain plants signal soil fertility
- Moisture indicators (Melaleuca - waterlogged)
- Vegetation structure - landscape position
- Post-fire succession - time since burning
Integrated soil assessment:
- Color, texture, structure (field-based)
- Landscape position context
- Vegetation associations
- Water behavior, animal activity
- Functional evaluation: Does it grow healthy plants? Hold water? Resist erosion?
Integration: Remote + proximal + lab + Indigenous
Activity (10-15 min): Near infrared soil spectroscopy
We’ll measure 3 soil samples:
- Sand: Quartz-dominated, low clay, low OM (bright, minimal absorption)
- Red-brown soil: Kaolinite, iron oxides (Fe absorption features)
- Black vertosol: Smectite clay, high OM (strong absorption)
For each soil sample:
- Collect spectrum (30 seconds)
- Show spectral signature on screen
- Describe key features
See how:
- Different soils have distinct “signatures”
- Mineralogy shows up in spectra
- Speed and ease of measurement
Summary: Measurement methods
1. Spatial and temporal variability drive measurement requirements
2. Three complementary approaches — no single method is sufficient
- Direct (field/lab) → accuracy and calibration
- Remote sensing → spatial coverage and context
- Proximal sensing → bridges the gap (speed + accuracy + coverage)
3. Indigenous landscape reading provides context that instruments alone cannot
4. Measurement underpins adaptive management and sustainability
Next: Where should we sample?
We’ve learned how to measure — after the break we’ll tackle where
The challenge:
- Landscapes and their components are spatially and temporally variable
- We can’t measure everywhere (cost, time constraints) thus we need to sample
- Sampling design affects what we can learn about landscape patterns
Bring what you’ve learned: landscape position, vegetation, and measurement trade-offs all inform sampling design